Sampling, Participants, and Ethics: What Master’s Students Get Wrong (and How to Fix It)

For many master’s students, sampling, participants, and ethics can be very confusing, not because they’re difficult, but because no one explains how they actually connect.

And if one of them is weak, it will affect your entire research design regardless of how good your topic is.

Let’s simplify it in a way that actually makes sense.

Why Sampling, Participants, and Ethics Are Connected

Think of your research like a tripod:

  • Sampling = how you choose your data
  • Participants = who provides that data
  • Ethics = how you protect them and your study

If one leg fails, the whole structure wobbles.

What Is Sampling?

Sampling is simply how you select a smaller group from a larger population.

Common Sampling Types

  • Probability sampling (random, stratified, systematic)
  • Non-probability sampling (convenience, purposive, snowball)

Here’s where many students slip up: they use convenience sampling but forget to justify it.

READ ALSO: How to Develop a Complete Master’s Thesis Outline

Quick Comparison Table

Sampling MethodStrengthsLimitationsBest Use
Random samplingHigh representativenessHard to organiseLarge quantitative studies
Convenience samplingEasy and fastBias riskExploratory studies
Purposive samplingRelevant participantsLimited generalisationQualitative research
Snowball samplingAccess to hidden groupsNetwork biasSensitive topics

Participants: More Than Just “Who I Interviewed”

Choosing participants is about who best answers your research question.

Common Participant Mistakes

  1. Recruiting only friends or classmates
  2. Ignoring diversity in the sample
  3. Choosing participants who don’t match the research aim
  4. Using too few participants without justification

Supervisors often look closely at whether your participants genuinely reflect your research context. That doesn’t mean perfection. It means logic.

READ ALSO: The Difference Between Research Gap and Research Problem (And How To Use Both For A Strong Thesis)

Ethics: More Than a Consent Form

Ethics is about trust.

Core Ethical Principles

  • Informed consent
  • Confidentiality and anonymity
  • Right to withdraw
  • Avoidance of harm

The “Alignment Rule” Most Students Miss

Your research works best when three things align:

  1. Your research question
  2. Your sampling strategy
  3. Your ethical approach

Simple Alignment Checklist

  • Does your sampling method fit your research aim?
  • Do your participants represent the phenomenon you’re studying?
  • Have you clearly addressed ethical risks?

If the answer is “yes” to all three, your methodology is already stronger than most.

FAQs

How many participants do I really need?

It depends on your method:

  • Surveys: 50–200+ respondents
  • Interviews: 6–15 participants
  • Case studies: 1–3 cases

Is convenience sampling acceptable?

Yes, if you justify it properly.

What if my ethics approval takes too long?

Plan for delays and design flexible methods, especially if you’re working within tight semester timelines.

Final Thoughts

When you understand how these three elements – sampling, participants, and ethics – work together, something surprising happens: your methodology becomes strategic.

And honestly? That’s when your dissertation begins to feel like your work, not just an academic requirement.

READ ALSO: The Different Types of a Literature Review (And How To Choose What Fits Your Study)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top